
Dr. Johannes WeiblOctober 26, 2026 · 6 min readKey points at a glance
Manufacturers of products for buildings are asked for an EPD more and more often: by planners calculating a building life cycle assessment, by developers aiming for a certification, and in tenders. This article explains what an EPD is, how it differs from a product carbon footprint (PCF), why it is gaining importance in sustainable construction and how it is created.
An EPD is a Type III environmental declaration under ISO 14025. It presents the results of a life cycle assessment in a uniform format and thus makes products more comparable. For construction products, EN 15804 defines which life cycle stages and indicators an EPD contains and how they are calculated. Our article on the relevant standards for environmental impact accounting shows how these standards fit together.
Three features distinguish an EPD from a simple manufacturer statement:
A PCF answers one question: how much greenhouse gas does a product cause? An EPD goes further. In addition to global warming potential, it contains other environmental indicators, for example on acidification, eutrophication, resource and water use. In addition, an EPD must always be externally verified, whereas this is optional for a PCF under ISO 14067, and for construction products it follows a fixed structure of life cycle modules.
Both rest on the same foundation: complete product data with bill of materials, materials, weights, energy consumption and upstream supply chains. If you already have a robust PCF, you already have a large part of the life cycle inventory for an EPD. On top of that come scenarios for use and end of life, the PCR-specific rules for example on cut-off criteria and allocation, and background data covering all indicators under EN 15804+A2, not just global warming potential. How far an assessment extends along the life cycle is explained in our article Cradle-to-Gate vs. Cradle-to-Grave.
EN 15804 divides the life cycle of a construction product into modules:
Since EN 15804+A2, EPDs must in principle declare the end of life (C1–C4) and module D in addition to production (A1–A3). The standard sets out the exceptions.
Building life cycle assessments and certifications: For certifications such as DGNB or the German Quality Seal for Sustainable Buildings (QNG), a life cycle assessment of the building is prepared. For this, planners need environmental data for the products installed. If no product-specific EPD is available, generic datasets are used, for example from the German government's ÖKOBAUDAT database, some of which include safety margins. Your own EPD, by contrast, represents your product with its actual values.
EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD): The revised Directive (EU) 2024/1275 requires the life cycle global warming potential of new buildings to be calculated and disclosed: from 2028 for new buildings with more than 1,000 m² of floor area, from 2030 for all new buildings. In Germany, the new Building Modernisation Act (Gebäudemodernisierungsgesetz, GModG), which replaces the GEG, implements this requirement.
New Construction Products Regulation: Regulation (EU) 2024/3110 has applied since 8 January 2026. It gradually makes environmental information, starting with global warming potential, part of the declaration of performance and conformity, as soon as the relevant harmonised specifications are available. The indicators are based on EN 15804.
Tenders: Public and private developers increasingly ask for EPDs in tenders. Manufacturers who can provide one have an advantage there.
For a long time, the focus was mainly on building materials such as concrete, steel, insulation or windows. With building life cycle assessments, building services are now coming into view as well: heat pumps, ventilation units, air conditioning systems, radiators, luminaires or switchgear. Many manufacturers in this field already publish EPDs. For electrical and electronic products, the PEP ecopassport programme based on EN 50693 is often relevant alongside EN 15804, especially for the French market.
For building services manufacturers, an EPD takes more effort than for many building materials:
As with a PCF, the biggest hurdle is rarely the calculation itself, but the data that comes before it: incomplete bills of materials, missing material and supplier data, many variants. This is exactly where we come in. Our data preparation and calculation for product carbon footprints creates the data foundation on which an EPD is also built.
Are you planning an EPD for your construction products or building services? Get in touch, we will be happy to support you with the implementation.

Discover the easiest way to audit-ready PCFs – AI-powered and expert-reviewed.
Book an initial call